Proposed 240-Unit Housing Development Sparks Debate in East Bridgewater

Residents voice concerns over infrastructure, schools as officials explain 40B process

EAST BRIDGEWATER, MA - August 7 - East Bridgewater residents voiced strong concerns about a proposed 240-unit housing development during a heated public hearing Wednesday night at the local high school.

The Meadowbrook project, which includes affordable housing units under the state's Chapter 40B law, faced intense scrutiny from community members worried about its potential impact on town infrastructure, schools, and quality of life.

"East Bridgewater is a beautiful, tiny little town. To destroy it with this great big conglomeration is horrible," said one resident, echoing sentiments expressed by many in attendance.

Town officials and representatives from various departments addressed questions about the project's effect on water supply, sewage systems, police and fire services, and local schools.

Jason Trepanier, the town's water superintendent, assured residents that East Bridgewater has sufficient water capacity for the development. "We are permitted from the DEP to pump 441.7 million gallons. So that leaves us with approximately 105 million gallons that we are permitted to pump," he explained.

School officials estimated the project would add between 88 and 98 students to the district. John Shea, School Business Manager, said, "I took a look at two studies out there, which provide ratios of school-age children per housing unit. I also took a look at our current 40B development wayside, and I am comfortable to say that I would estimate between 88 and 98 additional students as a result of this development."

Peter Freeman, attorney for the developer, outlined responses to concerns raised at previous meetings, including updates to parking plans and traffic management strategies.

Lynne Sweet, a housing consultant hired to assist the town, explained the Chapter 40B process and limitations on the town's ability to deny the project. "It is very hard to deny a 40B, but what the board is going to focus on and what all of the department heads have already focused on and much of what you're focusing on is what could impact the health and safety of residents in the community," Sweet said.

Residents questioned whether the project could be scaled back or if the town could deny third-party housing vouchers. Sweet explained that while changes may occur during the review process, certain restrictions like denying vouchers would likely violate fair housing laws.

Roy Gardner from the Planning Board raised concerns about parking for the apartment buildings. "A large apartment complex with 200 units, give or take a few, with only slightly over one space per unit, doesn't meet even the most simplistic mathematical review of what adequate parking is," he stated.

The Zoning Board of Appeals will continue to review the project, with the next meeting scheduled for Oct. 9. A site visit is planned for Sept. 21 at 10 a.m.